I’ll be blunt: These are very challenging times for independent journalism. First, social media companies like Facebook and X, which had long been a source of exposure and growth for independent outlets, sharply limited outbound traffic to news sites. Now, Google frequently directs users to AI-generated slop instead of relevant news articles. This has dramatically reduced the number of readers who discover independent media through search. These companies do not care about journalism. Or whether their users are well-informed. They care about profits. To survive and thrive in this hostile environment, Popular Information needs your help. Support independent accountability journalism by upgrading to a paid subscription. You can make a real impact for just $6 per month or $50 per year. Today, Americans are facing dramatically increased health care costs, with millions losing coverage and one in three cutting back on daily living expenses to cover medical bills. For the health savings account (HSA) industry, however, these are boom times. In a triumphant March 17 earnings call, HealthEquity, the nation’s largest administrator of HSAs, reported “accelerating earnings power… significant margin expansion, and record HSA sales.” Stephen Neeleman, HealthEquity’s founder and board vice chairman, attributed the company’s recent success to policy changes enacted by the Trump administration. During the call, Neeleman credited Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” for expanding HSA eligibility. He called the new law “the most significant structural change to the HSA market since the accounts were created.” HSAs allow people to set aside a portion of their pre-tax income to pay for medical expenses. While more HSAs mean more profits for HealthEquity — and function as an effective tax shelter for the wealthy — they do little to reduce the costs or improve the quality of health care for working Americans. HealthEquity is now making a major push for a more dramatic expansion of the HSA market. Meanwhile, a campaign finance report filed on Friday night revealed that MAGA, Inc, President Trump’s Super PAC, received a $1 million donation from HealthEquity on February 6. The money came directly from the company’s corporate treasury. Previously, HealthEquity had never made a federal campaign contribution exceeding $5,000. How HSAs benefit the wealthy and exploit working AmericansMost Americans with access to HSAs cannot afford to fund them. About 40% of Americans have outstanding medical or dental debt. This group, along with many others without current medical debt, does not have disposable cash to fund an HSA. That is why half of all HSAs have balances of less than $500, and one in five have a balance of zero. Seventy-seven percent of the value of HSAs goes to households with incomes of $100,000 or more. They are also laden with junk fees imposed by HealthEquity and other administrators, which further diminish their utility for people with small balances. The accounts are typically attached to high-deductible health insurance plans that can make necessary care unaffordable. In a February 24 advertorial published in the Washington Times, HealthEquity CEO Scott Cutler spun the fact that HSAs cause Americans to skip medical care as a positive feature that reduced costs. Cutler said that HSAs give Americans “skin in the game” and prevent “unnecessary utilization.” Wealthy Americans, however, are able to benefit substantially from HSAs. Since they pay a higher marginal tax rate, they benefit more from each dollar deposited in the account. A couple with $800,000 in annual income saves 37 cents for every dollar contributed to an HSA, more than three times the savings for a couple with $30,000 in annual income. The real value of HSAs for the wealthy lies in using them as a stealth retirement fund. They can contribute money to the account tax-free. Then invest those funds in stocks and have it grow tax-free. Wealthy HSA holders pay medical bills out of pocket, save the receipts, and reimburse themselves tax-free years or decades later while the money compounds. Even without significant medical expenses, withdrawals after age 65 are taxed as ordinary income, with no minimum distribution required. Financial advisors recommend that the wealthy pursue this strategy. Thayer Partners, a firm that caters to high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs), published an article earlier this month titled “Health Savings Account: The Ultimate Retirement Health Vehicle For HNWI.” The firm calls HSAs “a powerful wealth-building mechanism that savvy HNWIs are exploiting to maximum effect.” This tax loophole for the wealthy diverts funds that could otherwise be used to help people who lack affordable health insurance. Over the next 10 years, HSAs will cost about $190 billion. That would have been enough to extend the premium subsidies that expired at the end of 2025 — and are substantially increasing costs for millions of Americans — for at least 6 years. What the HSA industry wantsThe administrators of the HSAs benefit from the creation of new accounts, through fees, whether or not the HSAs benefit the account holders. The One Big Beautiful bill expanded the market for HSAs by allowing them to be attached to so-called bronze and catastrophic plans available in the ACA exchanges. These are high-deductible plans that previously could not offer HSAs. This change made about 10 million more Americans eligible for HSAs. This population is among the least likely to benefit from HSAs. More than 80% of marketplace enrolees had household incomes of $47,000 or less, making it unlikely that they |