Worth tracking down—if you don't already have one I am, by any measure, a casual AirTag user. Mine live on my keys and handbag—I check them maybe once a month (if that), usually when I put my keys anywhere other than their one designated spot in the house for some inexplicable reason. Saira Mueller Before Apple launched the AirTag in 2021, I used Tile trackers. Since then, the AirTag has been my go-to. So when Apple announced a new version in January, I thought: “What could possibly be different?” The answer was, in part, a promise that Precision Finding is better and the speaker is 50% louder (among other small things). Which led to the thought, “Are they actually better?” To find out, I enlisted three colleagues whose tracking needs look very different from mine. How we tested it: We put the second-generation AirTags through their paces starting mid-April. I attached mine to my keys; Emma clipped one to her dog's collar; Kelley ran Gen 1 and Gen 2 side by side on her kid’s stroller; and Zack had one in his carry-on bag while traveling. The Good: The Precision Finding improvement is real—Emma, Kelley, and I all found it noticeably more accurate for zeroing in on exactly where something is. The louder chime is also an upgrade—it was Zack’s main note. Also, they’re the same price as Gen 1 ($29 for one and $99 for four). The Complicated: Emma, who checks the app multiple times a day to track her dog Kona, said live tracking was "much more accurate" than the original in her suburban town. For Kelley's side-by-side test in a dense city, Gen 1 occasionally showed a more recent location update than Gen 2. The Bad: The extended Precision Finding only applies to the iPhone 15 or newer models (excluding iPhone 16e). Verdict: Signal. (If you're buying new, they’re still a great option—and now the default choice. If you already have a Gen 1, there’s no need to upgrade right now.) —SM |