Who wins, who loses, and what will never be the same again ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Over the past couple of weeks, we’ve asked experts to examine what the AI revolution could mean for the future of work across a range of industries, from the bottom rungs of the career ladder to the top.

At Victoria University’s Centre of Policy Studies, experts modelled how many job losses – and in some sectors, gains – AI disruption could produce through to 2050.

Some sectors are projected to lose thousands of workers. But others, like bricklaying, agriculture and hospitality, could see a boom.

We examined the importance of preparing young people – especially new graduates – for a changing career ladder and what factors could give mid-career to senior workers an enduring, competitive edge.

But big questions remain, like whether AI actually makes us more productive, and what the rules should be around using it responsibly at work.

Matthew Hall

Deputy Business & Economy Editor

Many Australians secretly use AI at work, a new report shows. Clearer rules could reduce ‘shadow AI’

Guzyal Hill, The University of Melbourne

A new report finds unapproved, worker-led ‘shadow use’ of generative AI can sometimes be a good thing. But the lack of clear national rules is confusing – and risky.

Best reads this week

Beyond recognition: the challenges of creating a new Palestinian state are so formidable, is it even possible?

Martin Kear, University of Sydney

A future state is complicated by the sheer number of Israeli settlers in the occupied territories and the barriers Israel has constructed to separate Palestinians.

The United States has changed. Australia hasn’t. It’s time to talk about where the relationship goes from here

Bruce Wolpe, University of Sydney

It’s time we had a considered national conversation about the US-Australia alliance, and where it goes from here.

If recreational vapes are banned, why are there still vape shops everywhere?

James Martin, Deakin University; David Bright, Deakin University

Fuelling these shopfronts is a thriving black market and a flawed policy approach. It’s time for viable, effective solutions.

The government has asked for bold proposals. Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Peter Siminski, University of Technology Sydney; Roger Wilkins, The University of Melbourne

When it comes to improving the fairness of the tax system, this is no time to be squeamish.

David Stratton was always ‘doing it for the audience’. In this, he had a huge impact on Australian film

Steven Maras, The University of Western Australia

The beloved Australian film critic David Stratton has died at 85.

TC Weekly podcast

Politics with Michelle Grattan: union boss Sally McManus on the push for shorter work hours in the age of AI

Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra

McManus doesn’t expect instant wins on shorter work hours from next week’s economic summit, but says it still needs to be on the table – along with AI protections.

Our most-read article this week

With new weapons, cash and battleground experience from Ukraine, North Korea has become much more formidable

Adam Simpson, University of South Australia

Is the new South Korean president’s softer approach to the North wise in a challenging new security environment?

In case you missed this week's big stories

It’s raining taxes
"I believe it would start raining in the Sahara Desert before any government would tax the family home. How about we look at tax breaks that allow major international businesses to pay little, or in some cases, no tax at all?"
Howard OBrien

Care isn’t an economic issue
"Some sectors, including aged and child care should NOT be an “economy”. Profit-seeking in the care industry ensures poor outcomes, these sectors should not be subject to market forces. This is where the neoliberal doctrine fails most spectacularly."
Andrew McLean

Time for universal basic income?
"Reading your short piece on the impact of AI on the jobs landscape for the middle class, it struck me that here may lie an important impetus for the adoption of UBI – universal basic income. There are quite a few examples of UBI already in place around the world, even if they are not so described. At the very least, we know that capitalism needs consumers. If there aren't enough to grease the wheels of commerce, then paying people to consume becomes a viable option."
John Hampshire

We'd love to hear from you. You can email us with your thoughts on our stories and each day we'll publish an edited selection.

 

Featured jobs

View all
Auckland University of Technology
Auckland, New Zealand • Contract
The Australia Institute
Canberra ACT, Australia • Contract
The University of Sydney
Camperdown NSW, Australia • Full Time
List your job