+ It’s likely headed to SCOTUS.

Audio Articles now available!

Download the Reuters App.

 

The Daily Docket

The Daily Docket

A newsletter by Reuters and Westlaw

 

By Caitlin Tremblay

This morning, we have a look at what’s next in the tariffs court case, which is almost certainly headed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Plus, a group of former lawyers from the DOJ and major law firms launched a nonprofit; the ABA is considering ending diversity requirements for board seats; and a federal judge said he won't explain an error-ridden ruling in Mississippi civil rights cases. Scientists have cracked the mystery of the potato (a tomato was involved). Let’s get going.

 

What happens next in the court battle over Trump's tariffs?

 

REUTERS/Athit Perawongmetha

As President Trump presses ahead with plans to reorder the global economy with the highest tariff rates since the early 1930s, let’s take a look at the tariff case before the Federal Circuit, which is almost certainly headed for the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • The case before the Federal Circuit challenges the tariffs Trump imposed in April and February (read the complaints here and here). However, a ruling against the administration would also undermine the latest round of sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries that he unveiled last week.
  • The case centers around Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Federal Circuit heard arguments last week. The panel of 11 judges sharply questioned the government about Trump's use of IEEPA, but did not rule from the bench.
  • If the Federal Circuit rules in the coming weeks, there is still time for the U.S. Supreme Court to add the case to its regular docket for the 2025-2026 term, which begins on October 6.
  • There's no consensus among court-watchers about what the Supreme Court will do. Critics of Trump's tariffs are optimistic their side will win. They point to the Supreme Court's decision from 2023 that blocked President Biden from forgiving student loan debt. In that ruling, the justices limited the authority of the executive branch to take action on issues of "vast economic and political significance" except where Congress has explicitly authorized the action. But the justices in other cases have endorsed a broad view of presidential power, especially when it comes to foreign affairs.
  • A loss at the Supreme Court would hamstring Trump in future tariff negotiations, but the White House has other ways of imposing tariffs, like a 1962 law that allows the president to investigate imports that threaten national security. Trump has already used that law to put tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, and those levies are not at issue in the case before the Federal Circuit.
  • Read more about what’s next in the case.
 

Coming up today

  • Lawyers for the deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, and the alleged victims in their sex trafficking cases face a deadline today to tell a U.S. judge their position on the DOJ’s bid to unseal the grand jury records in her case.
  • U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in D.C. will hold a preliminary injunction hearing in a class action lawsuit challenging the termination of the Inflation Reduction Act’s Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grant program. Read the complaint.
  • The FBI is expected to release its annual report on crime in the United States. 

Court calendars are subject to last-minute docket changes.

 

More top news

  • U.S. government restricts sports visas for transgender women
  • DOJ to open grand jury to investigate Obama officials, source says
  • CFTC to allow listed spot crypto trading on registered exchanges
  • U.S. judge says he won't explain error-ridden ruling in Mississippi civil rights case
  • U.S. could require up to $15,000 bonds for some tourist visas under new pilot program
  • Chemours, DuPont, Corteva settle New Jersey PFAS claims for $875 million
 
 

Industry insight

  • Former lawyers from the DOJ and major law firms have formed a new nonprofit to take on cases for free opposing actions by the Trump administration. Read more here.
  • Duane Morris must face a proposed class action accusing it of misclassifying some of its employees as partners in a bid to force them to pay part of the firm's taxes and expenses while denying them a share of its profits, U.S. District Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo in San Diego ruled. Read the order.
  • Moves: Private equity partner Bharath Mohan left Paul Weiss to join McGuireWoods … Usman Arain also left Paul Weiss and joined Willkie as a private equity partner … Willkie also added international arbitration partner Kristen Young from Boies Schiller … Former FDA investigator and compliance officer Seth Malihot joined Barnes & Thornburg’s healthcare practice …  Hugues Martin-Sisteron moved to Orrick’s energy and infrastructure practice from Clifford Chance … Stradley Ronon added Matthew Sadofsky to its capital markets practice from Ropes & Gray … Lowenstein Sandler hired Jeremy King to its insurance recovery practice from Olshan Frome Wolosky … Womble added 15 partners in Nashville … Thompson Coburn added real estate partner Steven Smith from Dorsey & Whitney … Holland & Knight hired healthcare regulatory partner Juliet McBride from King & Spalding … Frost Brown Todd hired business litigation partner Kevin Havelda from Wick & Trautwein … Ari Zak left Dechert to join Simpson Thacher’s tax practice … Burr & Forman recruited construction and project development partners Ben Goldammer and Danica Suedekum from Kay Griffin … Smith, Gambrell & Russell added dispute resolution partner Simon Kilgour from CMS Cameron McKenna.