Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei testifies during a Senate hearing on July 25, 2023 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)A federal judge in San Francisco
has ruled that training an AI model on copyrighted works without specific permission to do so was not a violation of copyright law.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup said that AI company Anthropic could assert a “fair use” defense against copyright claims for training its Claude AI models on copyrighted books.
But the judge also ruled that it mattered exactly how those books were obtained.
It was not okay, the judge wrote, for Anthropic to have downloaded millions of pirated titles and maintain a digital library.
The judge ordered a separate trial on Anthropic’s storage of those pirated books. He has not yet ruled whether to grant the case class action status.
With the ruling, Alsup addressed a question that has simmered since before OpenAI’s ChatGPT kick-started the generative AI boom in 2022: Can copyrighted data be used to train generative AI models without the owner’s consent?
Dozens of AI-and-copyright-related lawsuits have been filed over the past three years–most questioning the legal “fair use” of content—to find out.
Alsup’s ruling may set a precedent for these other copyright cases—although it is also likely that many of these rulings will be appealed, meaning it will take years until there is clarity around AI and copyright in the U.S.
—Sharon Goldman