FALLOUT
Precious frozen spit
Adobe
The emotional, financial and scientific fallout from the Trump administration’s dismantling of the National Institutes of Health is starting to come into focus.
Take the lede from Megan Molteni’s latest story: Jay Tischfield oversees one of the largest DNA banks in the world, replete with saliva samples to find genetic connections between substance use and mental health conditions like depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. But now, after receiving an email from NIH last week, the five-year grant powering these freezers will end prematurely. Similar scenes of chaos have played out in labs across the country in recent months.
The economic tally for this chaos is startling. The Trump administration cancelled over $1.4 billion in NIH grants in just a single month, according to a separate report published Thursday. The figure is imperfect and is likely an undercount, but points to an unprecedented disruption to science in the U.S.
The two centers that saw the greatest cuts to their portfolio were the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities and the National Institute of Nursing Research. Many of the cancelled grants were training grants, which support early-career researchers and are sometimes intended to promote diversity in the sciences. STAT’s Anil Oza has the full write-up.
POLICY
FDA speedrunning AI adoption
The Food and Drug Administration plans to rapidly roll out a generative AI model to assist scientific reviews across the agency by the end of June.
Calling it a “historic first,” FDA commissioner Marty Makary said Thursday that the AI tool will be deployed across all of the agency’s review offices, following the completion of pilot testing whose scope and rigor was not specified. It will be a high-stakes test of the technology’s use in vetting products used in the care of millions of Americans.
Experts have cautioned against adopting the technology too quickly for clinical purposes. The first meeting of FDA’s Digital Health Advisory Committee in November cited many of generative AI’s risks — including hallucinations, output variability, and privacy concerns — that should encourage careful testing before full adoption.
The announcement spurred many questions. What will be automated? How will federal officials ensure the model’s accuracy? My colleagues Casey Ross and Katie Palmer have the answer to these questions and more.
ADVOCACY
24-hour Medicaid vigil
Hundreds of disability advocates, Medicaid users, families and politicians gathered outside the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday for a 24-hour vigil focused on a simple message: Protect Medicaid.
The federal health program treats many of the country’s most vulnerable populations, including children and people with disabilities. Republicans have targeted the program for cuts, citing “waste, fraud, and abuse,” since President Trump took office, but Medicaid’s popularity with Americans has complicated their efforts.
The vigil featured dozens of speakers expounding upon why Medicaid was crucial for their health and well-being or for a loved one. Nicole Jorwic, chief program officer at Caring Across Generations, spoke about her brother, Chris, who is autistic and is on Medicaid.
He told her, “Medicaid…is a life boat to people like me. Medicaid gives my life color. Today it meant time in the community with my niece, nephew and support worker. Every day it means freedom. We must protect Medicaid to protect that freedom and independence for all disabled people.”